One Year On: 91 landlords punished under right to rent rules | Discuss

Welcome to the Property Forum where we can share our knowledge & experiences together to become better at what we do.

 Forum Terms & Conditions


Page not looking right? Please CLICK HERE to RELOAD

Enlarge/Change font size here

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —





 

— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
One Year On: 91 landlords punished under right to rent rules
02/02/2017
10:22 am
News @ Tenant Referencing
Moderator
Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 1610
Member Since:
01/08/2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It has been revealed that since the Right to Rent scheme was rolled out one year ago this week, a total of 91 landlords have been issued with civil penalties and fined a total of almost £30,000.

According to the latest figures published by the Government, 667 enquiries have been made to the Home Office’s landlords checking services specifically regarding tenants without the right to rent.

Under the Immigration Act 2014 it has been an offence to knowingly let a property to an illegal immigrant since 1st February 2016, as part of Government reforms to build a ‘fairer and more effective’ immigration system. Landlords are also legally obliged to carry out follow up checks if someone has a time-limited right to rent and are responsible for reporting those without right to rent to the Home Office. Those who do not carry out the checks properly or fail to move illegal migrants from their property face up to five years in jail and unlimited fines, as of December 2016.

Furthermore, a recent poll undertaken by the TR Group in the last quarter of 2016 worryingly revealed that 50% of 1,000 landlords where unaware of any such legislation being in place at all – meaning that circa. one million landlords are risking imprisonment of up to five years and/or an unlimited fine for failing to comply.

Divulged by Immigration Minister Robert Goodwill MP, in response to written Parliamentary questions from Stuart McDonald MP, Mr Goodwill said: “Home Office records show that in response to landlords making enquiries through the Landlords Checking Service, the Home Office has issued 503 responses during phase 1 of the scheme and 5,446 during phase 2. Of these, 62 responses during phase 1 and 605 responses during phase 2 were in respect of those without the right to rent.”

He also revealed that the majority of offences related to lodgers living in England without a right to rent in the UK – and confirmed none of the landlords involved had appealed the penalties.

He added: “Phase 1 of the right to rent scheme ran in the West Midlands from 1 December 2014 to 31 January 2016. Phase 2 of the scheme started across England from 1 February 2016.

“During phase 1 of the scheme, 15 landlords were issued with a civil penalty. Since the start of phase 2 of the scheme, 91 landlords have been issued with a civil penalty. All were first time penalties. 55 related to lodgers in a private household and 51 related to occupiers in rented accommodation.

“There have been no appeals under the scheme. The total amount collected from the scheme up to 13 December 2016 is £29,575.31.”

At Tenant Referencing UK we have our very own Home Office Compliant TR Immigration Document Checking Service for landlords and letting agents.

Not only can our new service verify whether a tenant has the right to rent in the UK, it is also the cheapest and most comprehensive Immigration Check available on the buy to let market (to-date); at £5 (5 credits) per report.

Find out how this new system works by clicking here.

Related topics:

Right to Rent: 31 deported and 75 landlords fined since July 2015

Referencing 4 Dummies: ‘Immigration ID Verification / Is it a blacklist…?’

Government immigration plans see lawful tenants refused housing

04/02/2017
2:36 am
PaulBarrett
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2897
Member Since:
11/10/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’m curious how was it discovered that a lodger didn’t have the RTR!?

Nobody would have been able to find out about any of my lodgers

I never informed anyone

Only by use of the Govt Connect supersnooper computer might they trace a lodger

Lodgers are effectively invisible

None of mine ever went on the council tax or electoral roll.

Unless any illegal was lifted at a workplace or nicked anywhere else I can’t see how these illegal lodgers were detected.

We await the first case of a little old lady live -in LL being jailed for taking in that nice young man for her spare room!!

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 755

Currently Online:
28 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

PaulBarrett: 2897

Mary Latham: 2193

LyndonBaker: 1805

David Price: 1681

Patricia A: 999

DATA CONTROL: 970

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2579

Members: 6461

Moderators: 6

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 3

Topics: 4550

Posts: 31223

Newest Members:

bjdore, nichola1972, casa1862, stubeattie, julietalbot, roymussell

Moderators: SamiiB: 455, News @ Tenant Referencing: 1610, laura: 15, Chloe: 107, lucybarr: 0, jaswhite: 20

Administrators: Paul Routledge: 3418

/* ]]> */