Landlords be careful claim for possession for N5B does not have mandatory fields | Discuss

Welcome to the Property Forum where we can share our knowledge & experiences together to become better at what we do.

 Forum Terms & Conditions


Enlarge/Change font size here

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —





 

— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
Landlords be careful claim for possession for N5B does not have mandatory fields
07/08/2018
11:36 am
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 3433
Member Since:
20/05/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I went to court yesterday for a section 21 possession order.

The CAB duty solicitor who was acting free for the tenant at the tax payers expense (even though the tenant had already spent two months UC and who lied to the court about never receiving any of the statutory documents etc, etc) realised that the form N5B Claim form for possession of a property located in England had a box not ticked.

The box was below question 11. Is the landlord a private registered provider of social house? The box allows you to tick Yes or No. However, if you tick “No” it does not make sure that any of the future boxes are mandatory and therefore if you do not tick the yes or fill in the next box about documents provided the case will be struck out.

The CAB solicitor then asked the tenant the loaded question “Have you seen this document” whilst holding up the how to rent guide and well!! What do you know the tenant said “NO”

As veteran landlords, who have been here before, we proved to the judge that our systems showed the tenant must have seen the how to rent guide. (This is included in the Tenant Referencing UK application forms) The judge accepted our submission and told the CAB solicitor that he did not want to strike out the case but would accept that if we agreed he would grant the CAB’s request for the maximum 42 days before possession. We agreed as we did not want to go through the whole episode again and agreed with the maximum of 42 days and of course that means another 42 days without a rent payment.

Lesson learnt so my message to all is be very careful of these forms because they do not have mandatory fields and they will try and trip you up and get the case thrown out if you miss a box or a section.

possession-n5b-e1533637904883.jpgImage Enlarger

08/08/2018
10:12 am
Sam Jackson
Guest
Guests

It is further evidence that they are trying to make it impossible to evict a tenant by section 21. They may not change the law to prevent serving a ‘no fault’ Section 21 eviction, but they are making it so hard to actually achieve it. We recently ran a NLCE CPD course on this subject, the law is very strict on when you must serve the ‘prescribed requirements’ and if you get it wrong you may never be able to serve a Section 21. Be warned October 1st 2018 is the deadline for remedying any of these matters. 

Do not get caught out learn the law with us for more details on up and coming courses contact the NLCE

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 755

Currently Online:
26 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

PaulBarrett: 2898

Mary Latham: 2194

LyndonBaker: 1805

David Price: 1695

Patricia A: 1022

DATA CONTROL: 979

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2605

Members: 6659

Moderators: 5

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 3

Topics: 4620

Posts: 31417

Newest Members:

edgelettings, kamalmohindra, nklettings, hannahcross, anngarcia, mhoml

Moderators: News @ Tenant Referencing: 1636, laura: 15, Chloe: 107, lucybarr: 0, jaswhite: 20

Administrators: Paul Routledge: 3433