Landlordreferencing.co.uk – Forum

31/10/2011 lrs_keeper

Subscribe to forum buttonSubscribe to member button
click for latest tenant alertsSUBSCRIBE TO NEWS LETTER

NEW STIE FORUM BANNER
RENTSAFE.CO box

Forum Discussions:

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS Related Topics
Lets get our priorities right!
17/04/2012
2:43 pm
K_Q_T
Guest

"It is important that we have a national minimum wage that provides the necessary protection for the lowest paid workers while at the same time not pricing people out of the labour market" – spokesman for the Department for Business.

 

17/04/2012
3:16 pm
Sharon Carmichael
Guest

Well, let me see, a days work at £200 means that, based on an 8 hour day is £25 an hour or, £1000 a week!!!  This would surely mean that the person earning this sum would not need benefit if they were earning that amount of money as that is more than I earn and that is before tax or should we support them at the same time as they are earning this?  Have I got this wrong or is my maths worse than I thought? Surprised

17/04/2012
5:39 pm
Kirsty
Guest

APMLBK said:

Qing Lim said:

What sorry state of affairs giving young tenant a job, they great at job and week later they disgrace themselves, telling us "Can't do job now, I get paid more to stay at home with boyfriend on benefits".

When will British society learn state benefits are not occupation, but a means to finding occupation?

 

Is there not an argument to raise the minimum wage?…….

 

Unfortunately raising the minimum wage in these times would actually put more small firms out of business creating more unemployment

17/04/2012
5:56 pm
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 1697
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

The employment market in this country is suffering because people have no real work ethics. I cannot tell you how many people we have had join and leave because they could not do what was written on their CV.

The worse think I am encountering as an employer is the look when you tell them to stop texting all day as their phones buzzes every 2 minutes or you have to tell them to get off facebook or they are sacked. They look at you as if you have just stolen their new bike.

Be interesting to hear from a teacher as to whether schools actually teach kids a lesson in work ethics and protocol because if they do most of my previous staff were skiving that dayLaugh 

17/04/2012
8:48 pm
PaulBarrett
Member
Forum Posts: 1328
Member Since:
12/10/2011
Offline

Paul Routledge said:

The employment market in this country is suffering because people have no real work ethics. I cannot tell you how many people we have had join and leave because they could not do what was written on their CV.

The worse think I am encountering as an employer is the look when you tell them to stop texting all day as their phones buzzes every 2 minutes or you have to tell them to get off facebook or they are sacked. They look at you as if you have just stolen their new bike.

Be interesting to hear from a teacher as to whether schools actually teach kids a lesson in work ethics and protocol because if they do most of my previous staff were skiving that dayLaugh 

 

I think what you are so surprised about is a the complete lack of respect and common courtesy towards an employer who is paying them to carry out work in the employers's time; breaks and lunchtimes are the the appropriate periods for workers to enagage in accessing their social media.

Mobiles should be put on silent and only be responded to in break times

As you suggest some employees are incredulous that you request them not to undertake social activities during work time, for which you are paying them, obviously if there is some quiet time and they ask you if it is ok to to a bit of facebook of other social media activity and you say yes, that is different.

But they have shown the courtesy and recognition that under normal circumstances they would not engage in such activities during work periods.

It is a simple concept to understand which does not appear to registered with some of your new workers.

It cannot be deemed to be unreasoanble to expect employees to do solely work whilst being paid to do so by an employer; or have I misunderstood the concept of employment!?

17/04/2012
9:01 pm
PaulBarrett
Member
Forum Posts: 1328
Member Since:
12/10/2011
Offline

It is the case still and will continue to be; that you are better off on benefit than working.

This be the case even more when UC is introduced.

The presnet govt position of increasing the qualifiaction hrs for tax credits will just result in  1person stopping working as if jointly they do not achieve 24 hours of work they will lose £3500 in tax credits.

The only sensible choice then is for 1 person to stop working leaving only 16 hrs needed for tax credit qualification.

Absolute madness.

There are also 1 1/2 million EU immigrants doing jobs that the unemployed should be doing; they wnon't bother as they are better off on benefit.

As you suggest even coming off benefit for 1 week can cause chaos when benefits need to be reistituted, it is just not worth the hassle for the majority of claimants.

04/05/2012
12:18 pm
Sal
Member
Forum Posts: 14
Member Since:
15/12/2011
Offline

I'm getting sick of hearing about how well the Labour party did in the elections last night.

It's obviously a protest vote against the coalition, which is fair enough, but am I the only person out there that realises this?! Lets get a grip – Labour have only received 39% of the vote!

What Ed Miliband, Harriet Harman and Ed Balls need to do – now that they've got the attention of the voters – is to stop slagging off the opposition and start letting us know what they are actually planning to do; to get us out of this cesspit of an economy!

 

Reminds me of that defunct company that were your competitors, always trying to slag you off but not actually doing anything pro-active in the property / referencing market – which is why, since registering with you, I've always sung your praises because you all work so hard for good landlords and good tenants. Laugh

04/05/2012
12:59 pm
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 1697
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

Well said Sal, but lets get it right: they can't tell us the plan because they don't have one!

When I listen to either of those 3 hypocrites, I only hear them ever tell us what the others do wrong (which apparently is everything)  rather than what they would do, which would be so right.

Someone needs to remind that lot that it was the Labour Government that near damn bankrupted this country and if Ms Harriet thinks we are all that silly, that we fall for her constant referrals to the s##t this country is in by suggesting that it was not them but a "global financial crisis" she really needs to take the sack off her headLaugh actually no keep it on.. !!

So here is a message to the Labour Government: The reason we are skint is because you spent the housekeeping on luxuries rather than essentials to keep the No.10 roof over your head and then when the voters looked in the tea pot and found there was no money to pay the rent ; you were evicted. So please stop telling us you were good tenants because we all know different – your tenure at No.10 was a disaster and your on our list.

Tenant Alert...

Last Labour Goverment 

Default £ 8000,000,000 (Yep £800 billion) 

Do not let in before contacting last voters Embarassed

 

04/05/2012
1:06 pm
cedric
golders green, london
Member
Forum Posts: 406
Member Since:
15/12/2011
Offline

I don't think you should be too surprised by last nights results Sal.  Labour have gained a number of Councils overnight but in my view they have just regained a number of Councils they had previously lost.  I doubt whether Birmingham, Cardiff, Derby, Dudley, Merythr Tydfil and Swansea would be considered true blue strongholds in any case !!!

Politicans do spend their lives slagging off other parties – It's part of their DNA !

How many people can remember the Expenses scandal now that they have managed to get their grip on the Murdoch dynasty like a rabid dog ?

Miliband, Harman and Balls are instrumental in the the chaos we have been left it !!!

04/05/2012
2:18 pm
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 1697
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

Ah ha Cedric,

2 eds and 4 faces lolLaugh

04/05/2012
4:33 pm
Kirsty
Guest

Why do those 3 never come up with a plan and just rubbish others.

 

The first thing to know is that a happy, self confident, person does not put others down. They might provide constructive criticism but they won’t put others down. This tells you a lot about these 3 persons who criticizes everything without giving an alternative and this is because:

- they need to make themselves feel like they're in control or more powerful or to cover up their own insecurities or failures in the past – to get others to focus on others take the spot light off of your weaknesses. Blame others and you wont be blamed.
- Some have experienced failure and trauma of their own in the past and they don’t know how to deal with the pain of their failures so they'll hurt others as a defense mechanism.

 

Politicians who attack other politicians to score points will probably reveal to you just how unhappy and disillusioned and frustrated they are with their position in life. when you understand this it goes a long way to understanding their problem,and Knowing this problem exists with them can go a long way to being able to detach from their comments.

If you know it has more to do with the person making the comments being a sore loser or self-delusion about their position in life than about the person they are having a go at, it makes it far easier to understand.

It is a classic bully's tactic and we all know bullies are usually very very weak people.

05/05/2012
6:45 am
Sharon Carmichael
Guest

Having read this thread, I think the message I have picked up is that it does not really matter whether you vote Labour, Conservatives, Lib/Dem, BNP or the Monster Raving Looney Party – the fact is that none of them have really achieved what they stated they could do at the outset.

I do think that we can all agree that we needed massive cuts in our economy to balance the House Keeping and I do have to agree with this site over the period that to continue to cut and not promote growth is the problem.

We should have made the very institutions that we bailed out, plough back investment into our manufacturing/GDP to give people jobs and create a balanced economy again.  To date the Conservatives, as far as I am concerned, have failed in this task.

But what I truly find sickening is that this seemingly large failure (which comes only midway through the Parliamentary period) is allowing the very 3 stooges who were party to the last massive failures and members of the raping and pillaging committee of our Country only some 2 years ago – are now given a voice to allow them to stand up and gloat that they are likely to become the next Government of this Country.

I just do not understand and it sickens me to the pit of my stomach and I find it incomprehensibly offensive that now I turn on my TV and this party who was instrumental in the destruction of this Country is allowed the media podium to ply us with their bull s**t and hoping we are all suffering from amnesia.

So, I view it that only 29% of people turned out to vote.  WHY? Because the other 71% think YOU ARE ALL SH*T.

The media of this Country need to focus on goodwill in getting us back on our feet and a positive way forward and stop allowing this continual drivel on our TV.  Put all 3 of these stooges into a box and keep them quiet for the next 3 years.  Yell

06/05/2012
12:04 am
PaulBarrett
Member
Forum Posts: 1328
Member Since:
12/10/2011
Offline

I am afraid that if the election results that occurred in the local elections are the same in the next genaral election; the old lot will get in.

Then just watch interest rates shoot up as the markets will have no confidence in Labour not to tax, borrow and spend, spend , spend on all those immigrants and benefit claimants, just like they did last tme.

They will allow even more EU and non-EU immigrants in as they tend to vote Labour.

The UK will then go the way of Greece and then the Tories will get in, left with all the c–p to sort out.

Unfortunately the Tory vote is diluted by alternative parties which then lets Labour win.

Unfortunately the only way to stop Labour is to vote only Tory or for the party which is Labour's best competitor

Will the electorate be savvy enough to engage in such tactical voting.

I would prefer to vote UKIP but can't as I have to vote Tory to ensure Labour doesn't win.

Therefore the next GE people who don't want Labour in should vote for the party that will beat Labour.

The Tories should be aware and try and encourage such tactical voting as that is the only way they will win.

Once the GE has been won, the Tories should recognise that they only won due to such tactical voting and they should recognise as such by carrying out some of the policies of these other parties, as a reward for them voting Tory.

If they did this it might encourage such voters to vote Tory in future.

The main thing must be however to stop Labour winning by dilution of the best opposition candidate vote, caused by the smaller parties.

If this doesn't occur we will end up with Labour by default again.

I nightmare scenario.

Would you trust them again!?

07/05/2012
12:29 pm
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 1697
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

OMG Laugh What a Nightmare thought,  but if that is not scary enough for us look what France has just got a new leader that doesn't believe in austerity and wants to create another 60,000 public sector jobs with no money.

Sacre' bleu Embarassed

08/05/2012
11:08 am
PaulBarrett
Member
Forum Posts: 1328
Member Since:
12/10/2011
Offline

Paul Routledge said:

OMG Laugh What a Nightmare thought,  but if that is not scary enough for us look what France has just got a new leader that doesn't believe in austerity and wants to create another 60,000 public sector jobs with no money.

Sacre' bleu Embarassed

 

All on a 35 hour working week!!

When was the last time you ever did a 35 hr working week……………………….if ever!!!!?

This Allonde will be a 1 term President.

They just don't seem to understand the concept of there is no more money.

The markets will not lend;  why should they!?

If they do it will cost the French citizens even more in tax and lower standards of living just to provide for all those 600000 civil servants.

What the voters do not like being told is the sweetie jar is no more and you will have to work hard for anything.

You have essentially whole populations of spoiled brats who don't like being told the party is over and they then behave like petulant children and vote for someone who gives them  the there,  there,  dear everything will be alright.

If Greece is still touch and go for staying in the Euro France can forget being bailed out.

09/05/2012
3:46 pm
lrs_keeper
Admin
Forum Posts: 129
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

The Queens Speech 2012 – What are your views on the proposed new laws??

09/05/2012
3:53 pm
Samii
Weston-super-Mare
Admin
Forum Posts: 178
Member Since:
24/05/2011
Offline

shame The Government didn''t view housing as a priority…
hopefully Boris will? > Think tank urges Boris to make housing a priority.

Samii. Social Media & Content Manager at LandlordReferencing.co.uk.
09/05/2012
4:06 pm
Paul Routledge
Admin
Forum Posts: 1697
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline

Reckon I could turn Buck house into a few studio apartments, with nice grounds and all,  but unfortunately Lizzie will not be allowed to stay on as we have a strict no pets policy and those little corgis scratching up the tapestry's will just not do!!  Laugh

02/06/2012
4:22 pm
lrs_keeper
Admin
Forum Posts: 129
Member Since:
20/05/2011
Offline
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 298

Currently Online: LyndonBaker
78 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

PaulBarrett: 1328

Mary Latham: 815

LyndonBaker: 789

cedric: 406

Patricia A: 350

newsatlandlordreferencing: 263

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 5

Topics: 1266

Posts: 11913

Newest Members: amiola, rkellygb, gordonthearchitect, michaelfreer, fal130963, Speedyduck

Administrators: Paul Routledge (1697), Samii (178)

Bookmark the permalink

Comments are closed.