It’s the situation every landlord dreads. You carry out your tenant reference properly (using landlordreferencing.co.uk, of course), the tenants seem like nice reasonable people but 12 months later they have trashed your property…and if you haven’t got a professional inventory and supporting evidence such as photos or (even better) a video you have no hope of retaining any part of the deposit. In fact, even if it is obvious to all that the tenant is responsible for the damage, literally all they have to say is “it was like that when I moved in”. The adjudication bodies regard the deposit as the tenant’s money and so if you cannot prove otherwise you will not be awarded any damages.
It was my own experience of this as a landlord that led to me starting The Video Inventory Agency. I let one of my own properties to two young women, I’d found through a colleague. Foolishly, because they came through someone I knew, I didn’t check their references! It turned out they were lap dancers. To be fair there was never a problem collecting the rent, but on checkout, I discovered they had installed a pole in the living room (to practise their routines), damaging both floor and ceiling. They had broken the legs of several chairs (I can only imagine how that occurred), there was red hair dye over the carpet in almost every room and over several of the wall heaters, the hob was cracked, the oven encrusted with carbon and one of their boyfriends had kicked holes in a bathroom door. All in all, about £4,000 worth of damages.
Luckily, I had instructed an inventory to be done at the start of the tenancy, so it should be fine – or so I thought. As it happened, the inventory which contained about 20 photographs did not cover any of the damaged areas and I was advised that it would be pointless to try and recover damages. Great ! I was appalled that they could get away with damaging the property and get away with it. That situation gave rise to the idea of starting The Video Inventory Agency so I could make sure landlords could be protected properly.
Judging by what our clerks have experienced over the last three years, I got off fairly lightly. Here are a few of the nightmares our landlord clients have experienced:
A tenant, who had in his wisdom, decided to build a first storey extension over the kitchen without telling the landlord or obtaining planning permission. It also didn’t comply with building regulations and had to be pulled down.
A tenant who had set the kitchen on fire several months before the end of the tenancy and had never bothered reporting it.
Several cases where, on conducting an interim inspection, we have discovered a cupboard or spare room is being used to grow cannabis.
Tenants who have seen fit to re-decorate in their own inimitable style. In one case painting the ceiling black, the walls deep purple gloss and the ‘piece de resistance,’ a mural of Marilyn Manson.
Several cases where tenants kept animals in contravention of the lease and allowed them to urinate inside the house so much so that the floorboards beneath the carpet were bleached and the whole house stank.
A tenant who stole a cherry tree from the back garden. He swore he had planted it – yet it was 10 years old and he had been in the property less than a year.
Tenants who have tried to replace new flat screen TVs with older models.
It is also worth noting that people have vastly different views of what is classed as ‘clean’. For example: one female tenant did not like the fact that our clerk commented on the state of the carpet. She claimed there was nothing wrong with it and that as she had only been in the property six months there had been no reason for her to have vacuumed it during that time.
We have also had tenants who have argued till they’re blue in the face that mould or grime in a bathroom is fair wear and tear or that the carbon buildup on a hob is a natural scientific reaction and they should not be charged for cleaning it.
In fact, even if nothing is damaged, you may have to spend £200 or more on a professional clean before it can be let again. If you do not have sufficient evidence, such as a high quality video, you simply will not be able to claim that cost from the tenant.
In our experience, no matter how ‘civilized’ your tenants seem at the start of a tenancy there is no telling how they will treat your property. Our video evidence supporting the written inventory gives you the most comprehensive evidence possible and should settle any dispute instantly (as it has done in every single case that has arisen so far), then our unique dispute resolution guarantee will cover all solicitors costs to act for the landlord to recover damages.
Frazer Fearnhead
For more information contact 0845 230 5197 (Quoting LandlordReferencing)
www.videoinventoryagency.co.uk

12/10/2011 
newsatlandlordreferencing
Bookmark the
Hi Samii. We currently produce full still photographic inventories of every room as we find they give us what we need and also allow us to zoom in to get a clear look at and area or item of interest.
How do you find the deposit protection schemes treat video evidence? Do they like it, does it carry much weight in your experience?
Have you ever used video evidence to substantiate deposit reduction?
Great post, thanks for producing it.
All thanks goes to the videoinventoryagency.co.uk for writing this piece for us.
Video inventories are one of the most thorough inventories on the market.
At LandlordReferencing we cannot express enough the need for good inventory, in fact if you read our letting protocol ( http://www.landlordreferencing.co.uk/blog/2011/07/05/letting-protocol-2/ ) which is so important for both new and old landlords to adhere to you, will see how vehement we are about crossing T’s and dotting I’s.
And the judge will always give the benefit of the doubt to the tenant if a landlord cannot support their case 100%.
It’s a little bit like LandlordReferencing, a landlord and letting agent must always be seen to do the utmost when it comes to diligence. It is widely accepted that the video inventory is the best and therefore is being used more and more.
The same reason that LandlordReferencing is growing so quickly applies; as traditional references coupled with Lifestyle References means Insurance companies are starting to realise that Lifestyle Referencing is a very important part of being a landlord of the future.
At LandlordReferencing one of our sayings is “to get the job done properly you must make sure you use the best tools in your box.”
As yet, we have never had a deposit dispute that we haven’t agreed outside of deposit arbitration.
And many thanks for taking the time to read and reply to our blog.
Whilst we do not use Video Inventories, (We do our own), I will endorse the use of video inventories. A video tells a story that is hard to refute!
Regards
Hi Carole,
Have you ever had your own challenged in court, I only ask as I would be interested what the outcome was. I have always felt for me the safest route ( allbeit more expensive) was the route that all items which may be relied upon in a possible court case at a latter date should be carried out by an independent unbiased party.
Paul R
This website has got a lot of very helpful info on it. Cheers for helping me!
I agree that video inventory are better than standard pictures. We walk the property whilst the Tenants are present and they are allowed to ask questions or point out items that they want captured on the video. We also film the applicants / Tenants on the video which shows they were present during the inventory.
Check out a sample of our standard video which we carry out free of charge for all our Tenant Find and Managed Properties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbFL7WqFe48
Polar Property Services
I think video evidence at start and finish with the tenants video presence in both ideally is an excellent way to avoid disputes which get nasty!!! I shall be recommending the process – as even amateur ones are so relatively easy to do these days with smart phones and the advances in vide technology!